Requested revision
| Standard: | 802.1AS-2011 | Clause: | General |
| Clause title: | RATIONALE FOR REVISION: | ||
Rationale for revision
General: There needs to be more clarity about what parts can be omitted for a one-port, listener-only endpoint. For instance, in Figure 10-2, I believe that PortSyncSyncSend and MDSyncSend are not needed in that case (although PortSyncSyncReceive then needs to handle an action that PortSyncSyncSend performs).
Proposed text
See Above
Impact on existing networks
None. Changes could help implementers avoid confusion.
Originator
| Name: | Paul Woods | Email: | pwoods@aptina.com<mailto:pwoods@aptina.com> ( via Dave Olsen dolsen@harman.com<mailto:dolsen@harman.com>) |
| Affiliation: | Aptina, LLC | ||
| Submitted: | 2012-10-31 | ||